Service

Marketing for financial services

The work itself is not what makes this sector different. The approval path is. Every asset passes at least one compliance review before it goes live, often two. Anyone who has not built that loop into the editorial calendar loses several weeks per campaign. We plan for it rather than discover it.

Why the approval path drives everything

German financial promotion is governed by rules on performance claims, risk disclosure and advertising identification. In practice this means each piece of content passes at least one review, often two, before publication.

Agencies used to consumer work usually discover this after the first campaign slips. We plan the other way round: the editorial calendar is built with a review window inside it, so campaign dates hold even when legal takes a week.

What we do

  • Editorial planning with a built-in review window. Content is produced far enough ahead that compliance and legal can read it without campaign dates collapsing.
  • Content for products that need explaining. Funds, pensions, discretionary mandates. Subjects that resist being compressed into a claim and still have to be understood.
  • LinkedIn advertising for institutional audiences, targeted by function, sector and company size, where the audience is financial advisers, portfolio managers or CFOs.
  • YouTube and video for longer explanatory formats, produced in house by dot-films.
  • Meta advertising for reach in the awareness phase and for retargeting along the advisory path.
  • Measurement down to a business signal, not reach. Which signal counts is defined at the outset and differs by institution.

Who this is for

We work with banks, insurers, fund companies, asset managers and financial technology firms. The fit is right when there is a compliance function we can agree a review path with, and when marketing is treated as continuous work rather than a series of campaigns.

Where we are the wrong choice. Purely transactional comparison portals, where price is the only argument, gain little from this approach. So do individual intermediaries without their own approval structure, because the process overhead outweighs the budget. And if short-term sales figures are the only objective, performance advertising without brand building is more honest, though it is not what we sell.

How we work

1. Take stock. What runs today, which channels are active, and how the approval path actually behaves. Not as drawn in the org chart, but how long it takes in practice.

2. Decide the channel. Which channel carries which job. This is deliberately the first advisory step rather than a foregone conclusion. Often the answer is one channel, not four.

3. Agree the approval path. Who reviews what, in which order, within which deadline. This step governs speed and cost more than any creative decision.

4. Production, delivery, reporting. Ongoing operation with monthly analysis. After three months there is a reliable answer to whether the chosen channel carries.

Results

We have worked in digital marketing since 2001, with DAX-listed companies, federal ministries and institutional clients. From the financial sector:

ClientResultPeriod
MarketVector Indexes4.6m views, 80,126 hours watch time, 81.4% of viewers in the 25 to 44 target groupsince 2017

Note for approval: please verify these figures against your own reporting before publication.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions.

What does an engagement in the financial sector cost?
An ongoing engagement starts at €3,500 per month for one channel. For the first three months we charge €3,000. Across several channels the entry point is €6,000. Financial engagements usually run across several channels in practice, so they start at €6,000. The effort depends mainly on the number of channels and on how many review stages your compliance process requires. Media budget is always separate.
Why is financial marketing more expensive than other sectors?
Production is not more expensive. Getting there is. Every asset passes a review, often two, which creates coordination and revision work that other sectors do not carry.
How long before we see results?
First performance data after four to six weeks. A reliable answer on whether a channel carries after three months. Where the objective is building trust through longer formats, expect six to twelve months.
Is social media compatible with our compliance requirements?
Yes, provided the review path exists before the first publication. We bring compliance and legal into planning rather than into sign-off.
Which channel suits asset managers?
Usually LinkedIn, because decision-makers can be reached by function and firm. YouTube carries explanatory content over longer formats. Meta adds reach in the early phase. Which combination makes sense is settled before any media budget is committed.
Do you handle regulatory approval on our behalf?
No. Regulatory responsibility stays with you. We deliver content in a form your compliance function can review, and set up the process so that review does not break the schedule.
Will you work alongside our existing agency?
Yes. In several engagements we hold one channel or the production while another agency runs classical communications. The condition is a clear boundary of responsibility agreed in writing before we start.
Is there a minimum term?
Not in the pilot phase. For ongoing work we agree three months, because a reliable assessment is not possible before that.

Next step

We review your starting point free of charge and recommend the right order of work.

Request the free assessment